Monitoring of Lyme borreliosis and meningoencephalitis agents in ticks
In 2006 the monitoring of up-to-date percentage of ticks infected with the aetiological agents of Lyme borreliosis and meningoencephalitis in the selected areas on the territory of Prague continued. The monitoring is purposefully aimed at the monitoring of activity of natural infection focuses under the Capital City conditions. The text is based on the chapter Monitoring of Lyme borreliosis and meningoencephalitis agents in ticks published in yearbook Prague Environment 2006.
(the text below is based on the chapter Monitoring of Lyme borreliosis and meningoencephalitis agents in ticks published in yearbook Prague Environment 2006)
In 2006 the monitoring of up-to-date percentage of ticks infected with the aetiological agents of Lyme borreliosis and meningoencephalitis in the selected areas on the territory of Prague continued. The monitoring is purposefully aimed at the monitoring of activity of natural infection focuses under the Capital City conditions.
The tick specimens collecting was performed by flagging at the selected localities by workers of the Department of Epidemiology of the Public Heath Authority of the City of Prague in the co-operation with personnel of the Municipal Public Health Authority, branches of Centre, South, West, East, and North. Testing was carried out by the Reference Laboratory for Lyme borreliosis of the SZÚ, Prague and the Reference Laboratory for Arboviruses of the Regional Public Health Authority in Ostrava.
Climatic conditions in 2006 again affected the biological development cycle of ticks, namely in summer months when the fluctuating weather conditions prevailed. The laboratories received the required number of tick specimens in every stadium of their development to carry out examination for meningoencephalitis (the basic number is 40 nymphs, 20 females, 10 males) while for testing for Lyme borreliosis samples with smaller number of tick specimens were received.
The results of the examinations for the presence of aetiological agent of Lyme borreliosis in ticks acquired by microscopic investigation showed average presence in 9.18 % pursuant to the written report of the National Reference Laboratory for Lyme borreliosis of the SZÚ, Prague.
Results of the continuous examination of ticks for the presence of tick-transmitted meningoencephalitis virus were positive for adult populations at the localities Prague 4, Kunratice – Zelené domky, where 10 females were found positive. Rest of the localities demonstrated negative results. Up-to-date results are available at the Internet pages of the Public Heath Authority of the City of Prague (www.hygpraha.cz).
The results demonstrate the prevention is necessary (as wearing suitable clothes, applying repellents, early removal of sucking ticks, including disinfection of the sucking place, and vaccination) if aforementioned localities are visited. The vaccination is carried out by the National Institute for Public Health or primary care physicians and the autumn season is the best time to get the first dose of the vaccine administered.
Tab. Percentage of ticks infected with aetilological agent of meningoencephalitis – localities provided by the Department of Epidemiology of the Public Health Authority of Prague in 2006
Locality | Date | Females | Males | Nymphs | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P8, Ďáblický háj |
2. 5. 2006 |
50 |
40 |
20 |
110 |
results |
5x10-neg. |
2x20-neg. |
20-neg. |
110 |
|
P9, Sata1ická obora |
3. 5. 2006 |
14 |
20 |
40 |
74 |
results |
14-neg. |
20-neg. |
40-neg. |
74 |
|
P9, Klánovický les |
4. 5. 2006 |
10 |
13 |
50 |
73 |
results |
10-neg. |
13-neg. |
50-neg. |
73 |
|
DDD – Divoká Šárka |
22. 5. 2006 |
13 |
16 |
80 |
109 |
results |
13-neg. |
16-neg. |
40-neg. |
109 |
|
P10, Hostivař |
24. 5. 2006 |
20 |
20 |
50 |
90 |
results |
2x10-neg. |
20-neg. |
50-neg. |
90 |
|
P4, Kunratický les |
5. 6. 2006 |
11 |
27 |
85 |
123 |
results |
11-neg. |
27-neg. |
43-neg. |
123 |
|
P4, Točná |
6. 6. 2006 |
23 |
25 |
164 |
212 |
results |
10-neg. |
25-neg. |
3x40-neg. |
212 |
|
P4, Milíčovský les |
7. 6. 2006 |
23 |
14 |
54 |
91 |
results |
10-neg. |
14-neg. |
54-neg. |
91 |
|
P4, Kunratický les – |
13. 6. 2006 |
17 |
22 |
49 |
88 |
results |
10-neg. |
22-neg. |
49-neg. |
88 |
|
P4, Kunratický les – |
14. 6. 2006 |
55 |
54 |
59 |
168 |
results |
5x10-neg. |
2x20-neg. |
40-neg. |
168 |
|
P4, Kunratický les – |
19. 6. 2006 |
53 |
37 |
38 |
128 |
results |
10-pozit!-(18,86 %) |
20-neg. |
38-neg. |
128 |
Source: HS HMP
Tab. Percentage of ticks infected with aetilological agent of Lyme borreliosis – localities provided by the Department of Epidemiology of the Public Health Authority of Prague in 2006
Locality | Date | Number of samplings |
Females | Males | Nymphs | Total | % positive |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDD – Praha 1, Petřín |
10. 5. 2006 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
21 |
29 |
|
results |
neg. |
neg. |
2 pos. |
6,89 |
|||
P5, Radotín, Velký Háj |
15. 5. 2006 |
1 |
16 |
19 |
23 |
58 |
|
results |
2 pos. |
1 pos. |
1 pos. |
6,89 |
|||
P9, Horní Počernice |
16. 5. 2006 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
16 |
|
results |
neg. |
2 pos. |
neg. |
12,50 |
|||
P7, Letná |
22. 5. 2006 |
1 |
10 |
4 |
2 |
16 |
|
results |
1 pozit |
neg. |
neg. |
6,25 |
|||
P10, Hostivař |
24. 5. 2006 |
1 |
20 |
20 |
50 |
90 |
|
results |
2 pos. |
1 pos. |
5 pos. |
8,88 |
|||
P6, Obora Hvězda |
29. 5. 2006 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
58 |
70 |
|
results |
neg. |
1 pos. |
6 pos. |
10,00 |
|||
P4, Kunratický Les |
7. 6. 2006 |
1 |
34 |
25 |
127 |
186 |
|
results |
5 pos. |
4 pos. |
9 pos. |
9,67 |
|||
DDD – P6, Divoká |
14. 6. 2006 |
1 |
11 |
9 |
75 |
95 |
|
results |
3 pos. |
1 pos. |
6 pos. |
10,52 |
|||
P4, Točná II |
15. 6. 2006 |
1 |
9 |
14 |
81 |
104 |
|
results |
neg. |
I pos. |
neg. |
0,96 |
|||
P3, Pražačka |
15. 6. 2006 |
1 |
26 |
25 |
8 |
59 |
|
results |
3 pos. |
2 pozit |
2 pos. |
11,86 |
|||
P5, Pod Kesnerkou |
15. 6. 2006 |
1 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
19 |
|
results |
1 pos. |
neg. |
neg. |
5,26 |
|||
P7, Stromovka |
19. 6. 2006 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
52 |
65 |
|
results |
neg. |
neg. |
2 pos. |
3,07 |
|||
PS, Barandov |
19. 6. 2006 |
1 |
22 |
20 |
13 |
55 |
|
results |
3 pos. |
2 pos. |
1 pos. |
10,90 |
|||
P4, Klánova – u dg. úst. |
20. 6. 2006 |
1 |
7 |
10 |
5 |
22 |
|
results |
1 pos. |
2 pos. |
neg. |
13,63 |
|||
DDD – Petřín, Praha 1 |
22. 6. 2006 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
15 |
22 |
|
results |
1 pos. |
2-neg. |
2 pos. |
13,63 |
|||
P4, Kunratický les |
11. 9. 2006 |
1 |
17 |
17 |
6 |
40 |
|
results |
4-pos. |
2-pos. |
6-neg. |
15,00 |
|||
P9, Klánovický les |
12. 9. 2006 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
26 |
|
results |
1-pos. |
4-neg. |
2-pos. |
11,53 |
|||
P4, Milíčovský les |
13. 9. 2006 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
60 |
64 |
|
results |
1-pos. |
1-neg. |
4-pos. |
7,81 |
Source: HS HMP
Archive: